Last Updated: August 23, 2026
At AI Companion Lab, we aim to publish information that is accurate, useful, and relevant to people researching AI companion apps and platforms. Because this industry changes quickly, some information can become outdated even when it was accurate when originally published.
Features can change, subscription plans can be updated, pricing can move, privacy policies can be revised, and platforms can introduce or remove capabilities. Our Corrections Policy explains how we handle factual errors, outdated information, and reader submitted corrections.
What We Consider a Correction
A correction is generally appropriate when an article contains information that is factually incorrect or materially misleading.
Examples may include:
- An incorrect price
- A feature that no longer exists
- An incorrect platform specification
- An inaccurate statement about availability
- An outdated subscription limit
- A factual error about how a feature works
- A broken or incorrect official link
- An incorrect statement about a platform’s policy
- A significant factual error in a comparison
Not every disagreement requires a correction. Differences in opinion, preference, interpretation, or personal experience may not represent factual errors.
Types of Updates We May Make
| Situation | How We May Handle It |
| Factual Error | Correct the inaccurate information |
| Outdated Feature | Update or remove the affected information |
| Price Change | Review and update current pricing where appropriate |
| Broken Link | Replace, remove, or repair the link |
| Policy Change | Review the relevant section and update it |
| Minor Wording Issue | Edit the wording for clarity |
| Reader Opinion | Usually treated as feedback rather than a factual correction |
| Conflicting Information | Investigate available sources before deciding whether an update is needed |
The appropriate action depends on the nature and significance of the issue.
How to Report an Error
If you find something that appears incorrect, please contact AI Companion Lab with enough information for us to investigate the issue.
Ideally, include:
- Article URL
- Specific statement or section
- What you believe is incorrect
- Suggested correction
- Supporting source, preferably an official or reliable source
- Date or context, if the information changed recently
For example, instead of saying:
“The pricing is wrong.”
A more useful correction would be:
“The article currently lists the monthly plan as X, but the provider’s current pricing page lists Y. Here is the official source.”
This gives us enough context to verify the information.
Sources We Prefer
When checking a correction, we consider the reliability and relevance of the available evidence.
For platform specific information, useful sources may include:
- Official pricing pages
- Official product documentation
- Official help centers
- Official terms of service
- Official privacy policies
- Official announcements
For broader factual claims, we may consider other reliable and relevant sources where appropriate.
A source does not automatically make a claim correct. We consider the context, date, and relevance of the information before changing an article.
How We Verify Corrections
We do not automatically publish every suggested correction.
When a correction is received, we may:
Review the original statement → Check available evidence → Compare relevant sources → Determine whether an update is necessary → Update the article when appropriate
This approach is particularly important for AI companion platforms because information can differ by:
- Subscription plan
- Country or region
- Device
- Account type
- Product version
- Date
- Feature availability
A reader may therefore see something different from what another user experienced without either report necessarily being incorrect.
Corrections vs. Opinions
Not every difference of opinion is a factual error.
For example, statements such as:
- “This app has the best personality.”
- “This platform is easier to use.”
- “This is the best AI girlfriend app.”
- “I prefer this service over another one.”
may involve editorial judgment or personal experience.
Our reviews and comparisons may contain editorial assessments, and those assessments can differ from a reader’s experience.
We are more likely to treat something as a factual correction when it can be verified independently.
Pricing Corrections
Pricing requires particular attention because it can change frequently.
If you find outdated pricing, please provide the provider’s current pricing page when possible.
We may update:
- Monthly pricing
- Annual pricing
- Free plans
- Free trials
- Credit systems
- Message limits
- Feature restrictions
- Subscription tiers
We may also add context when pricing varies by region, billing period, or subscription type.
Readers should always verify the final price directly with the provider before purchasing.
Feature Corrections
AI companion platforms regularly add, remove, or modify features.
If an article says that a platform offers a feature that has been removed, or fails to mention a significant change, please provide the relevant current information.
For example, corrections may involve:
- Memory
- Voice chat
- Image generation
- Character customization
- Roleplay
- Messaging limits
- Mobile apps
- Desktop access
- Account controls
Where appropriate, we will review the relevant section and update it.
Review Corrections
Our reviews contain both factual information and editorial assessment.
If you believe a factual statement in a review is incorrect, we encourage you to report it.
If you simply disagree with our assessment, that does not necessarily mean the review contains an error.
For example:
“The platform does not offer voice chat.”
is a factual claim that can potentially be verified.
Whereas:
“The voice experience is not very good.”
is an editorial assessment that may reasonably differ between users.
We may update an assessment when new evidence or significant product changes justify doing so.
Corrections From Platform Representatives
Representatives of AI companion platforms are welcome to contact us about inaccurate or outdated information concerning their services.
A platform representative may provide:
- Updated product information
- Current pricing
- Feature changes
- Documentation
- Policy updates
- Official clarification
We may review this information as part of our normal editorial process.
Providing information does not guarantee that an article will be changed, rewritten, or given a more favorable assessment.
Material Corrections
When a significant factual correction changes the meaning or usefulness of an article, we may make a more substantial update to the relevant section.
Depending on the situation, we may also update the article’s last updated date so readers can understand that meaningful changes have been made.
We do not necessarily publish a separate correction notice for every minor spelling, formatting, or wording change.
Minor Editorial Changes
Small changes may be made without a separate correction notice.
These can include:
- Spelling mistakes
- Grammar
- Formatting
- Broken formatting
- Minor wording improvements
- Link formatting
- Clarity improvements
Such changes do not normally affect the factual meaning of the article.
What Happens After a Correction Is Submitted?
After receiving a correction request, we may:
- Review the submitted information.
- Check the original article.
- Verify the supporting source.
- Compare relevant information.
- Decide whether an update is appropriate.
- Make the necessary change when supported by the evidence.
We may not respond individually to every submission, particularly when the message is a general suggestion rather than a specific correction request.
No Guarantee of Acceptance
Submitting a correction does not guarantee that we will make the requested change.
We may decline a correction when:
- The evidence does not support the claim
- The information represents an opinion
- The information cannot be independently verified
- The suggested change is promotional rather than factual
- Reliable sources provide conflicting information
- The issue does not materially affect the accuracy of the article
Our responsibility is to make editorial decisions based on the available evidence rather than simply accepting the most recent request.
Keeping Content Current
Corrections are only one part of maintaining our content.
We may proactively review articles when we become aware of significant changes to a platform, including:
- New features
- Removed features
- Pricing changes
- Subscription changes
- Major product updates
- Privacy policy changes
- Availability changes
- Important changes to platform functionality
Our goal is not to make every page permanently static. Content should evolve when the underlying information changes.
How to Contact Us
To report an error or request an update, contact AI Companion Lab using the official contact details below.
Website: AICompanionLab.net
Email: aicompanionlab.net@gmail.com
When contacting us, please include the article URL and the specific information you believe needs correction.
Our Commitment
Accuracy is an ongoing responsibility, particularly in a category where AI companion platforms and their features change rapidly.
AI Companion Lab welcomes constructive corrections because they can help us identify outdated information, clarify confusing explanations, and improve the usefulness of our reviews, comparisons, and guides.
We will continue to review correction requests carefully and make changes when reliable evidence shows that an article needs to be corrected or updated.